Breaking Gold Medalist Phil Wizard Says Raygun Doesn’t Deserve the Meme Machine’s Wrath

The b-boy weighed in on the past, present, and future of his sport during WIRED’s The Big Interview event.
Image may contain Performer Person Solo Performance Clothing Footwear Shoe Adult Accessories Jewelry and Necklace
Phil Wizard breaking on stage at The Big Interview.Photograph: Tristan deBrauwere

Phil Wizard isn’t Raygun. In a conversation with WIRED contributor Dexter Thomas at Tuesday’s Big Interview event, the Canadian b-boy and Olympic gold medalist went out of his way to differentiate his work and that of his peers from that of the much-maligned Australian b-girl.

While Wizard (real name: Phil Kim) says he has immense sympathy for Raygun, saying no one deserves to be bullied or mocked as she has in the months that have followed this summer’s Paris Games, he also said she didn’t have the high level of talent and expertise that other breakers at the Olympics possessed. Noting that Raygun reached the Games by winning the Oceania qualifiers, which were held rather last-minute and with relatively few competitors, Wizard said it was “unfortunate” that the narrative coming out of breaking’s Olympic debut was focused on her.

Wizard added that gaps in ability like the ones between Raygun and her fellow breakers isn’t all that unusual in other sports. There are always swimmers, runners, and other athletes that qualify for competition that never really have a chance of getting a medal. But because breaking has a subjective judging system, he said, the average Olympic viewer couldn’t really understand that she was “significantly worse than other people.”

While breaking isn’t slated for inclusion in the 2028 Games in Los Angeles—something that was already planned before the Paris games, pre-Raygun—Wizard said that if the sport was to appear, he would hope that changes would be implemented to make judging and scoring more transparent. While events like figure skating or gymnastics have both technical and artistic criteria laid out for competitors, spectators, judges, and commentators to see, breaking doesn’t, with judging ultimately becoming much more opaque and subjective.

Phil Wizard and Rahul behind stage at The Big InterviewPhotograph: Tristan deBrauwere

“It needs to be more transparent,” Wizard said. “This person won. Why did they win, by what margin, and with what technical details? We have to put in a lot more work to make it more easily understandable.” Those might not have been problems organizers or breakers thought about before the Games, he said, but with a world of novice and newbie fans tuning in now, it’s something that has to be changed.

Wizard hopes that, going forward, breakers and the sport’s organizers as a whole put a little more work into connecting the sport with its hip-hop roots. The connections between rappers, emcees, graffiti artists, and breakers have all gotten blurred as generations have passed, he said, noting that while some rappers came out as supporting breaking in the Olympics, others called it “wack.” Recognizing the sport’s roots in the hip-hop community, where breakers would dance on the break or what he calls “the hypest part” of a record, is important.

“Context and generations have diluted that message over time,” Wizard says, “and it’s the responsibility of anyone with a platform like myself or any other high-level breaker to teach that, because if we don’t, we’ll lose it.”

Rahul (left) and Phil Wizard breaking at The Big Interview.Photograph: Tristan deBrauwere